• THE DEVIL'S MISTRESS
    PART 12
    The cool, damp air of the midnight garden offered little solace. Jessica paced the manicured paths, the scent of night-blooming jasmine heavy and cloying, failing to mask the bitter taste of humiliation and confusion that lingered from Amanda’s assault and the terrifying confrontation. She’d run from the gun, from Amanda’s venom, from Scar’s terrifying, lethal rage – even though it had been wielded in her defense. The image of him, cold and absolute with the pistol aimed at Amanda’s head, was seared into her mind. It wasn’t fear *of* him, but fear *for* him, for the darkness that Amanda could provoke.
    She finally returned to the penthouse, the silence now thick with unspoken aftershocks. Pushing open her bedroom door, she found him immediately. Not waiting, not pacing, but kneeling beside her bed, his broad shoulders slumped, his head bowed. In the dim light from the hallway, he looked not like the feared kingpin, but like a man utterly broken. He didn’t look up as she entered, but his posture spoke volumes – a silent plea for forgiveness, an embodiment of the guilt and anguish he’d voiced earlier.
    "Jessica," his voice was a raw scrape in the quiet. "Please…"
    She stood frozen for a moment, the sight twisting her heart. The part of her that still ached from Amanda’s words, that felt bruised by the secrets, warred fiercely with the overwhelming love and empathy she felt seeing him like this. He had chosen her. He had defended her with terrifying ferocity. Yet, the emotional storm inside her was still raging. She needed space to breathe, to process, to quiet the echoes of "gutter rat" and the crack of the gun.
    "Scar," she whispered, her voice trembling. "I… I need some time. Please. Just… give me some space tonight."
    He flinched as if struck. Slowly, agonizingly slowly, he raised his head. His eyes, usually so commanding, were pools of raw pain and utter defeat. He searched her face, finding no anger, only a profound exhaustion and a plea for distance. He swallowed hard, the sound loud in the stillness. Without a word, he pushed himself up from his knees. He didn’t touch her. He didn’t argue. He simply bowed his head again, a gesture of absolute surrender, and walked silently out of the room, closing the door with a soft, final click. The sound echoed Jessica’s loneliness.
    ***
    The next morning, Amanda was gone. Vanished. Like a poisonous mist dispersed by the dawn. William confirmed it tersely; she’d been escorted to the airport before sunrise, under firm instructions and the lingering threat of Scar’s promise. The penthouse felt emptier, cleaner, yet the tension didn’t dissipate. It shifted, solidified into something colder: Scar’s absence.
    For two weeks, he became a ghost in his own home. He skipped breakfast, leaving before Jessica rose. Dinner was taken in his study, the door firmly closed. He returned late, often well past midnight, slipping silently into his own room. When their paths did cross – Jessica heading to her study nook, Scar striding down a hallway – he would freeze for a fraction of a second, his expression shuttering instantly into an impenetrable mask, then he would turn and walk the other way. The warmth, the possessiveness, the easy intimacy – all gone, replaced by a chilling, deliberate distance.
    Jessica felt the void like a physical ache. The luxurious penthouse became a gilded cage of silence. Her studies felt hollow. She replayed the scene in her bedroom that night – his kneeling form, the utter defeat in his eyes, her own request for space. *Was I too harsh? * The question gnawed at her. He had faced down his past, his dangerous ex-fiancée, for *her*. He had chosen her publicly, violently, irrevocably. And how had she repaid him? By pushing him away when he was most vulnerable, when he came offering his shattered heart.
    Guilt, sharp and corrosive, joined the loneliness. She remembered his whispered confessions of love, the way he’d clung to her after Amanda’s arrival, the desperation in his pleas outside her locked door. He had fought for her, bled for her emotionally, and she had turned him away. *I went too far in my hurt, * she realized with a sickening jolt. *He gave me everything, defended me against everything, and I pushed him into this cold exile.*
    The resolve solidified within her. She couldn’t let this stand. She had to fix it. She *needed* to fix it.
    ***
    The day she decided to bridge the chasm stretched endlessly. Jessica was a bundle of nervous energy. She paced, she tried to read, she stared out the window, her mind racing with scenarios. Would he reject her? Would the wall he’d built be too high? Was the damage irreparable? Anxiety twisted her stomach into knots. By the time the familiar sound of the penthouse door announced his return at 11 PM, her heart was pounding against her ribs like a trapped bird.
    She heard his footsteps, heavy with fatigue, move down the hall towards his room. The click of his door closing was like a starter pistol. Taking a deep, steadying breath that did little to calm her nerves, Jessica slipped out of her room. The hallway felt vast and intimidating. She stopped outside his door, her hand trembling slightly as she raised it. She knocked – a soft, tentative sound.
    No answer.
    Gathering every ounce of courage, she gently turned the handle. The door wasn’t locked. She pushed it open just enough to slip inside, closing it softly behind her.
    The room was dimly lit by a single bedside lamp. The air held the faint, clean scent of his cologne. And then she saw him.
    He stood framed in the open doorway of the en-suite bathroom, bathed in the brighter light spilling from within. A white towel was slung low around his hips. Water droplets glistened on his shoulders, tracing paths down the powerful contours of his chest, over the defined ridges of his abdomen, catching the light on his dark skin. He was a vision of raw, masculine beauty – tall, perfectly sculpted, water-darkened curls clinging to his forehead. He looked like a figure from a myth; a god carved from night and strength.
    He had frozen mid-motion, a second towel in his hands paused over his damp hair. His eyes, dark and unreadable, locked onto hers. Shock, then a flicker of something guarded and wary, passed across his face before it settled into careful neutrality. He didn’t speak. He simply watched her, waiting.
    Jessica’s breath caught. Shyness and confusion warred with the overwhelming surge of love and longing that seeing him like this ignited. Words tangled in her throat. How could she start? How could she bridge the weeks of silence?
    The sight of him, the sheer magnetism, the vulnerability she sensed beneath his guarded stance, broke her hesitation. Without a word, she crossed the room in quick, determined strides. Before he could react, before he could retreat behind his walls, she threw her arms around his waist, pressing her cheek against the cool, damp skin of his chest. She held on tightly, as if anchoring herself to him.
    For a heartbeat, he remained rigid. Then, a shuddering breath escaped him. His arms came around her, slowly at first, then crushing her to him with a force that spoke of weeks of pent-up longing and relief. The towel fell from his hands, forgotten. He buried his face in her hair, his breath warm against her scalp. "Jessica," he breathed, her name a ragged prayer.
    The dam broke. All the distance, the coldness, the aching loneliness evaporated in the heat of their reunion. They came together not just with passion, but with a profound, desperate hunger, like two halves finally made whole after a cruel separation. It wasn't just physical; it was a fierce reclaiming; a deep communion of souls starved for connection. They devoured each other with kisses that tasted of salt tears and unspoken apologies, with touches that mapped familiar territory with new reverence. Scar worshipped her body with a slowness that bordered on agony, relearning every curve, every sigh, every sensitive point, as if imprinting her on his soul anew. Jessica met him with equal fervor, her own hands exploring the powerful planes of his back, his shoulders, tangling in his damp curls, pulling him closer, deeper. Time lost meaning. The world outside ceased to exist. There was only the slide of skin on skin, the gasps and whispered pleas, the overwhelming sensation of being utterly consumed and cherished. It was love-making as healing, as desperate affirmation, as a vow renewed in the most primal language.
    Later, tangled in the sweat-slicked sheets, limbs entwined, Scar stirred. He brushed a strand of hair from her forehead, his eyes dark with emotion. "Jessica, about before… I need to tell you… I’m so sorry I didn’t—"
    She silenced him not with words, but by placing her fingers gently on his lips. Then, she replaced them with her own, kissing him with a tenderness that held the weight of her own regret and forgiveness. "Shhh," she murmured against his lips, her voice husky with spent passion and deep affection. "No more apologies. Not tonight." She traced his jaw, her eyes holding his, luminous in the dim light. "Just… make love to me again, Sebastian. I’ve missed you… missed *this*… so much."
    He needed no further invitation. The hunger, momentarily sated, flared anew, deeper, sweeter this time. They moved together in a slow, sensual rhythm, a dance of reconnection, of promises whispered through touch, of wounds beginning to knit closed in the shared heat of their bodies. It was tender, passionate, a reaffirmation of the bond Amanda had tried, and failed, to break.
    Exhausted, sated, wrapped in the profound peace that follows the storm, they finally drifted towards sleep. Scar held her tightly against him, her back to his chest, his face buried in the curve of her neck, his arms locked securely around her waist. Jessica nestled into his embrace, her hand resting over his where it lay protectively on her stomach. The silence now was warm, comforting, filled only with the sound of their synchronized breathing. The distance was closed. The sanctuary, though scarred, was reclaimed. They slept, entwined, the shadows of the past two weeks finally banished by the undeniable force of their love.
    TO BE CONTINUED...
    THE DEVIL'S MISTRESS PART 12 The cool, damp air of the midnight garden offered little solace. Jessica paced the manicured paths, the scent of night-blooming jasmine heavy and cloying, failing to mask the bitter taste of humiliation and confusion that lingered from Amanda’s assault and the terrifying confrontation. She’d run from the gun, from Amanda’s venom, from Scar’s terrifying, lethal rage – even though it had been wielded in her defense. The image of him, cold and absolute with the pistol aimed at Amanda’s head, was seared into her mind. It wasn’t fear *of* him, but fear *for* him, for the darkness that Amanda could provoke. She finally returned to the penthouse, the silence now thick with unspoken aftershocks. Pushing open her bedroom door, she found him immediately. Not waiting, not pacing, but kneeling beside her bed, his broad shoulders slumped, his head bowed. In the dim light from the hallway, he looked not like the feared kingpin, but like a man utterly broken. He didn’t look up as she entered, but his posture spoke volumes – a silent plea for forgiveness, an embodiment of the guilt and anguish he’d voiced earlier. "Jessica," his voice was a raw scrape in the quiet. "Please…" She stood frozen for a moment, the sight twisting her heart. The part of her that still ached from Amanda’s words, that felt bruised by the secrets, warred fiercely with the overwhelming love and empathy she felt seeing him like this. He had chosen her. He had defended her with terrifying ferocity. Yet, the emotional storm inside her was still raging. She needed space to breathe, to process, to quiet the echoes of "gutter rat" and the crack of the gun. "Scar," she whispered, her voice trembling. "I… I need some time. Please. Just… give me some space tonight." He flinched as if struck. Slowly, agonizingly slowly, he raised his head. His eyes, usually so commanding, were pools of raw pain and utter defeat. He searched her face, finding no anger, only a profound exhaustion and a plea for distance. He swallowed hard, the sound loud in the stillness. Without a word, he pushed himself up from his knees. He didn’t touch her. He didn’t argue. He simply bowed his head again, a gesture of absolute surrender, and walked silently out of the room, closing the door with a soft, final click. The sound echoed Jessica’s loneliness. *** The next morning, Amanda was gone. Vanished. Like a poisonous mist dispersed by the dawn. William confirmed it tersely; she’d been escorted to the airport before sunrise, under firm instructions and the lingering threat of Scar’s promise. The penthouse felt emptier, cleaner, yet the tension didn’t dissipate. It shifted, solidified into something colder: Scar’s absence. For two weeks, he became a ghost in his own home. He skipped breakfast, leaving before Jessica rose. Dinner was taken in his study, the door firmly closed. He returned late, often well past midnight, slipping silently into his own room. When their paths did cross – Jessica heading to her study nook, Scar striding down a hallway – he would freeze for a fraction of a second, his expression shuttering instantly into an impenetrable mask, then he would turn and walk the other way. The warmth, the possessiveness, the easy intimacy – all gone, replaced by a chilling, deliberate distance. Jessica felt the void like a physical ache. The luxurious penthouse became a gilded cage of silence. Her studies felt hollow. She replayed the scene in her bedroom that night – his kneeling form, the utter defeat in his eyes, her own request for space. *Was I too harsh? * The question gnawed at her. He had faced down his past, his dangerous ex-fiancée, for *her*. He had chosen her publicly, violently, irrevocably. And how had she repaid him? By pushing him away when he was most vulnerable, when he came offering his shattered heart. Guilt, sharp and corrosive, joined the loneliness. She remembered his whispered confessions of love, the way he’d clung to her after Amanda’s arrival, the desperation in his pleas outside her locked door. He had fought for her, bled for her emotionally, and she had turned him away. *I went too far in my hurt, * she realized with a sickening jolt. *He gave me everything, defended me against everything, and I pushed him into this cold exile.* The resolve solidified within her. She couldn’t let this stand. She had to fix it. She *needed* to fix it. *** The day she decided to bridge the chasm stretched endlessly. Jessica was a bundle of nervous energy. She paced, she tried to read, she stared out the window, her mind racing with scenarios. Would he reject her? Would the wall he’d built be too high? Was the damage irreparable? Anxiety twisted her stomach into knots. By the time the familiar sound of the penthouse door announced his return at 11 PM, her heart was pounding against her ribs like a trapped bird. She heard his footsteps, heavy with fatigue, move down the hall towards his room. The click of his door closing was like a starter pistol. Taking a deep, steadying breath that did little to calm her nerves, Jessica slipped out of her room. The hallway felt vast and intimidating. She stopped outside his door, her hand trembling slightly as she raised it. She knocked – a soft, tentative sound. No answer. Gathering every ounce of courage, she gently turned the handle. The door wasn’t locked. She pushed it open just enough to slip inside, closing it softly behind her. The room was dimly lit by a single bedside lamp. The air held the faint, clean scent of his cologne. And then she saw him. He stood framed in the open doorway of the en-suite bathroom, bathed in the brighter light spilling from within. A white towel was slung low around his hips. Water droplets glistened on his shoulders, tracing paths down the powerful contours of his chest, over the defined ridges of his abdomen, catching the light on his dark skin. He was a vision of raw, masculine beauty – tall, perfectly sculpted, water-darkened curls clinging to his forehead. He looked like a figure from a myth; a god carved from night and strength. He had frozen mid-motion, a second towel in his hands paused over his damp hair. His eyes, dark and unreadable, locked onto hers. Shock, then a flicker of something guarded and wary, passed across his face before it settled into careful neutrality. He didn’t speak. He simply watched her, waiting. Jessica’s breath caught. Shyness and confusion warred with the overwhelming surge of love and longing that seeing him like this ignited. Words tangled in her throat. How could she start? How could she bridge the weeks of silence? The sight of him, the sheer magnetism, the vulnerability she sensed beneath his guarded stance, broke her hesitation. Without a word, she crossed the room in quick, determined strides. Before he could react, before he could retreat behind his walls, she threw her arms around his waist, pressing her cheek against the cool, damp skin of his chest. She held on tightly, as if anchoring herself to him. For a heartbeat, he remained rigid. Then, a shuddering breath escaped him. His arms came around her, slowly at first, then crushing her to him with a force that spoke of weeks of pent-up longing and relief. The towel fell from his hands, forgotten. He buried his face in her hair, his breath warm against her scalp. "Jessica," he breathed, her name a ragged prayer. The dam broke. All the distance, the coldness, the aching loneliness evaporated in the heat of their reunion. They came together not just with passion, but with a profound, desperate hunger, like two halves finally made whole after a cruel separation. It wasn't just physical; it was a fierce reclaiming; a deep communion of souls starved for connection. They devoured each other with kisses that tasted of salt tears and unspoken apologies, with touches that mapped familiar territory with new reverence. Scar worshipped her body with a slowness that bordered on agony, relearning every curve, every sigh, every sensitive point, as if imprinting her on his soul anew. Jessica met him with equal fervor, her own hands exploring the powerful planes of his back, his shoulders, tangling in his damp curls, pulling him closer, deeper. Time lost meaning. The world outside ceased to exist. There was only the slide of skin on skin, the gasps and whispered pleas, the overwhelming sensation of being utterly consumed and cherished. It was love-making as healing, as desperate affirmation, as a vow renewed in the most primal language. Later, tangled in the sweat-slicked sheets, limbs entwined, Scar stirred. He brushed a strand of hair from her forehead, his eyes dark with emotion. "Jessica, about before… I need to tell you… I’m so sorry I didn’t—" She silenced him not with words, but by placing her fingers gently on his lips. Then, she replaced them with her own, kissing him with a tenderness that held the weight of her own regret and forgiveness. "Shhh," she murmured against his lips, her voice husky with spent passion and deep affection. "No more apologies. Not tonight." She traced his jaw, her eyes holding his, luminous in the dim light. "Just… make love to me again, Sebastian. I’ve missed you… missed *this*… so much." He needed no further invitation. The hunger, momentarily sated, flared anew, deeper, sweeter this time. They moved together in a slow, sensual rhythm, a dance of reconnection, of promises whispered through touch, of wounds beginning to knit closed in the shared heat of their bodies. It was tender, passionate, a reaffirmation of the bond Amanda had tried, and failed, to break. Exhausted, sated, wrapped in the profound peace that follows the storm, they finally drifted towards sleep. Scar held her tightly against him, her back to his chest, his face buried in the curve of her neck, his arms locked securely around her waist. Jessica nestled into his embrace, her hand resting over his where it lay protectively on her stomach. The silence now was warm, comforting, filled only with the sound of their synchronized breathing. The distance was closed. The sanctuary, though scarred, was reclaimed. They slept, entwined, the shadows of the past two weeks finally banished by the undeniable force of their love. TO BE CONTINUED...
    Love
    1
    1 Yorumlar 1 hisse senetleri 281 Views
  • What is Overfamiliarity?
    Overfamiliarity is more than just being comfortable around someone. It's a state where you start to take the person, their position, and their words for granted. It can manifest as:
    Disrespect: Ignoring or downplaying the prophet's counsel or authority.

    Lack of Reverence: Becoming numb to the spiritual truths being shared, even if they were once impactful.

    Taking Things for Granted: Failing to appreciate the time, effort, and grace offered by the prophet.

    Criticism and Negativity: Focusing on perceived flaws or shortcomings rather than the overall message and ministry.
    Why is it a Problem?

    Hindered Spiritual Growth:
    Overfamiliarity can block the flow of God's grace and anointing in your life.

    Offense and Division:
    It can lead to taking offense at the prophet's words or actions, potentially causing division within the community.
    Missed Blessings:

    When you fail to honor and respect the prophet's role, you may miss out on the blessings and breakthroughs that God intends for you.

    Damaged Relationships:
    Overfamiliarity can erode the foundation of trust and respect in any relationship, including a spiritual one.

    Avoiding Overfamiliarity:
    Intentionally Honor:
    Make a conscious effort to honor the prophet's position and the grace they carry.

    Value the Message:
    Focus on the spiritual truths being shared and their potential impact on your life, rather than dwelling on personal preferences or opinions.

    Maintain Respect:
    Be mindful of your words and actions, treating the prophet with the respect they deserve.
    Seek Understanding:
    If you have questions or concerns, address them with humility and a desire to understand, rather than through criticism.

    By avoiding overfamiliarity, you can cultivate a healthy and fruitful relationship with your prophet, allowing you to receive the blessings and guidance that God intends for you.
    What is Overfamiliarity? Overfamiliarity is more than just being comfortable around someone. It's a state where you start to take the person, their position, and their words for granted. It can manifest as: Disrespect: Ignoring or downplaying the prophet's counsel or authority. Lack of Reverence: Becoming numb to the spiritual truths being shared, even if they were once impactful. Taking Things for Granted: Failing to appreciate the time, effort, and grace offered by the prophet. Criticism and Negativity: Focusing on perceived flaws or shortcomings rather than the overall message and ministry. Why is it a Problem? Hindered Spiritual Growth: Overfamiliarity can block the flow of God's grace and anointing in your life. Offense and Division: It can lead to taking offense at the prophet's words or actions, potentially causing division within the community. Missed Blessings: When you fail to honor and respect the prophet's role, you may miss out on the blessings and breakthroughs that God intends for you. Damaged Relationships: Overfamiliarity can erode the foundation of trust and respect in any relationship, including a spiritual one. Avoiding Overfamiliarity: Intentionally Honor: Make a conscious effort to honor the prophet's position and the grace they carry. Value the Message: Focus on the spiritual truths being shared and their potential impact on your life, rather than dwelling on personal preferences or opinions. Maintain Respect: Be mindful of your words and actions, treating the prophet with the respect they deserve. Seek Understanding: If you have questions or concerns, address them with humility and a desire to understand, rather than through criticism. By avoiding overfamiliarity, you can cultivate a healthy and fruitful relationship with your prophet, allowing you to receive the blessings and guidance that God intends for you.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 120 Views
  • What is Overfamiliarity?
    Overfamiliarity is more than just being comfortable around someone. It's a state where you start to take the person, their position, and their words for granted. It can manifest as:
    Disrespect: Ignoring or downplaying the prophet's counsel or authority.

    Lack of Reverence: Becoming numb to the spiritual truths being shared, even if they were once impactful.

    Taking Things for Granted: Failing to appreciate the time, effort, and grace offered by the prophet.

    Criticism and Negativity: Focusing on perceived flaws or shortcomings rather than the overall message and ministry.
    Why is it a Problem?

    Hindered Spiritual Growth:
    Overfamiliarity can block the flow of God's grace and anointing in your life.

    Offense and Division:
    It can lead to taking offense at the prophet's words or actions, potentially causing division within the community.
    Missed Blessings:

    When you fail to honor and respect the prophet's role, you may miss out on the blessings and breakthroughs that God intends for you.

    Damaged Relationships:
    Overfamiliarity can erode the foundation of trust and respect in any relationship, including a spiritual one.

    Avoiding Overfamiliarity:
    Intentionally Honor:
    Make a conscious effort to honor the prophet's position and the grace they carry.

    Value the Message:
    Focus on the spiritual truths being shared and their potential impact on your life, rather than dwelling on personal preferences or opinions.

    Maintain Respect:
    Be mindful of your words and actions, treating the prophet with the respect they deserve.
    Seek Understanding:
    If you have questions or concerns, address them with humility and a desire to understand, rather than through criticism.

    By avoiding overfamiliarity, you can cultivate a healthy and fruitful relationship with your prophet, allowing you to receive the blessings and guidance that God intends for you.
    What is Overfamiliarity? Overfamiliarity is more than just being comfortable around someone. It's a state where you start to take the person, their position, and their words for granted. It can manifest as: Disrespect: Ignoring or downplaying the prophet's counsel or authority. Lack of Reverence: Becoming numb to the spiritual truths being shared, even if they were once impactful. Taking Things for Granted: Failing to appreciate the time, effort, and grace offered by the prophet. Criticism and Negativity: Focusing on perceived flaws or shortcomings rather than the overall message and ministry. Why is it a Problem? Hindered Spiritual Growth: Overfamiliarity can block the flow of God's grace and anointing in your life. Offense and Division: It can lead to taking offense at the prophet's words or actions, potentially causing division within the community. Missed Blessings: When you fail to honor and respect the prophet's role, you may miss out on the blessings and breakthroughs that God intends for you. Damaged Relationships: Overfamiliarity can erode the foundation of trust and respect in any relationship, including a spiritual one. Avoiding Overfamiliarity: Intentionally Honor: Make a conscious effort to honor the prophet's position and the grace they carry. Value the Message: Focus on the spiritual truths being shared and their potential impact on your life, rather than dwelling on personal preferences or opinions. Maintain Respect: Be mindful of your words and actions, treating the prophet with the respect they deserve. Seek Understanding: If you have questions or concerns, address them with humility and a desire to understand, rather than through criticism. By avoiding overfamiliarity, you can cultivate a healthy and fruitful relationship with your prophet, allowing you to receive the blessings and guidance that God intends for you.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 116 Views
  • *OPEN HEAVENS DAILY DEVOTIONAL*

    *DATE: MONDAY 9TH JUNE 2025.*

    *TOPIC: CLEAVE AS ONE, PART 1*

    *MEMORIZE*
    “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” Genesis 2:24 (KJV)

    *BIBLE READING: PROVERBS 5:15-21*
    15 Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well.

    16 Let thy fountains be dispersed abroad, and rivers of waters in the streets.

    17 Let them be only thine own, and not strangers' with thee.

    18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.

    19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.

    20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?

    21 For the ways of man are before the eyes of the Lord, and he pondereth all his goings.

    *MESSAGE:*
    We live in a fast-paced world where many people are chasing wealth and riches at all costs. As a result, many marriages are suffering. In some cases, a husband works in a different state or country while the rest of his family lives in another state or country. Long-distance courtships have existed for a long time, but now, we have long-distance marriages. In truth, however, a long-distance marriage isn’t healthy for any family. A couple can have a short-term arrangement for them to be apart for unavoidable reasons, but this should not be for long.

    Many cases of infidelity in marriage result from the absence of one spouse. Sometimes, even married couples that live together practice long-distance marriages. This might be because one spouse leaves for work very early in the morning and gets back very late at night. Such couples are living separate lives, and one or both of the spouses are likely to form connections with the people they spend most of their time with in their spouse's absence. Such connections can turn into ungodly affairs.

    As a married fellow, if you notice that you prefer talking to other people than talking to your spouse, there is fire on the mountain. When you prefer spending time outside your home rather than with your spouse, there is trouble. When you prefer discussing intimate issues with your 'friends' of the opposite sex instead of your spouse, you should retrace your steps and work on fixing whatever issues that exist in your marriage. Don't deceive yourself by saying, "I'm not doing anything with that fellow; we are just friends." Most extra-marital relationships start from casual friendships, and after a while, the devil introduces temptations that can lead to sinful acts. I pray that you will overcome any temptation that can destroy your marriage, in Jesus' name.

    If you're married, spend more time with your spouse and make him or her your confidant. Go out to fun places and take frequent walks together. At least once a month, dress up and go on a date. Book a hotel room or a private lodge for a weekend at least once every year so you can spend quality time with your spouse, away from all distractions. After your relationship with God, your relationship with your spouse is the most important in your life because God has designed you both to become one, as today's memory verse points out. Be intentional about cleaving to your spouse, and God will bless your marriage, in Jesus' name.

    *KEY POINT*
    Married people should be intentional about spending quality time with their spouses.

    *AUTHOR: PASTOR E. A. ADEBOYE*

    *BIBLE READING IN ONE YEAR:*
    *PSALMS 22 - 27*

    *HYMNAL 31 - YIELD NOT TO TEMPTATION*
    1. Yield not to temptation,
    For yielding is sin; Each victory will help you Some other to win; Fight manfully onward, Dark passions subdue; Look ever to Jesus, He'll carry you through.
    Ask the Saviour to help you
    Comfort, strengthen, and keep
    you; He is willing to aid you,
    He will carry you through.

    2. Shun evil companions,
    Bad language disdain; God's name hold in reverence, Nor take it in vain; Be thoughtful and earnest, Kindhearted and true; Look ever to Jesus, He'll carry you through.

    3. To him that overcometh God giveth a crown; through faith we will conquer, though often cast down; he who is our saviour our strength will renew; look ever to Jesus, he'll carry you through.
    *OPEN HEAVENS DAILY DEVOTIONAL* *DATE: MONDAY 9TH JUNE 2025.* *TOPIC: CLEAVE AS ONE, PART 1* *MEMORIZE* “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” Genesis 2:24 (KJV) *BIBLE READING: PROVERBS 5:15-21* 15 Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well. 16 Let thy fountains be dispersed abroad, and rivers of waters in the streets. 17 Let them be only thine own, and not strangers' with thee. 18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. 20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger? 21 For the ways of man are before the eyes of the Lord, and he pondereth all his goings. *MESSAGE:* We live in a fast-paced world where many people are chasing wealth and riches at all costs. As a result, many marriages are suffering. In some cases, a husband works in a different state or country while the rest of his family lives in another state or country. Long-distance courtships have existed for a long time, but now, we have long-distance marriages. In truth, however, a long-distance marriage isn’t healthy for any family. A couple can have a short-term arrangement for them to be apart for unavoidable reasons, but this should not be for long. Many cases of infidelity in marriage result from the absence of one spouse. Sometimes, even married couples that live together practice long-distance marriages. This might be because one spouse leaves for work very early in the morning and gets back very late at night. Such couples are living separate lives, and one or both of the spouses are likely to form connections with the people they spend most of their time with in their spouse's absence. Such connections can turn into ungodly affairs. As a married fellow, if you notice that you prefer talking to other people than talking to your spouse, there is fire on the mountain. When you prefer spending time outside your home rather than with your spouse, there is trouble. When you prefer discussing intimate issues with your 'friends' of the opposite sex instead of your spouse, you should retrace your steps and work on fixing whatever issues that exist in your marriage. Don't deceive yourself by saying, "I'm not doing anything with that fellow; we are just friends." Most extra-marital relationships start from casual friendships, and after a while, the devil introduces temptations that can lead to sinful acts. I pray that you will overcome any temptation that can destroy your marriage, in Jesus' name. If you're married, spend more time with your spouse and make him or her your confidant. Go out to fun places and take frequent walks together. At least once a month, dress up and go on a date. Book a hotel room or a private lodge for a weekend at least once every year so you can spend quality time with your spouse, away from all distractions. After your relationship with God, your relationship with your spouse is the most important in your life because God has designed you both to become one, as today's memory verse points out. Be intentional about cleaving to your spouse, and God will bless your marriage, in Jesus' name. *KEY POINT* Married people should be intentional about spending quality time with their spouses. *AUTHOR: PASTOR E. A. ADEBOYE* *BIBLE READING IN ONE YEAR:* *PSALMS 22 - 27* *HYMNAL 31 - YIELD NOT TO TEMPTATION* 1. Yield not to temptation, For yielding is sin; Each victory will help you Some other to win; Fight manfully onward, Dark passions subdue; Look ever to Jesus, He'll carry you through. Ask the Saviour to help you Comfort, strengthen, and keep you; He is willing to aid you, He will carry you through. 2. Shun evil companions, Bad language disdain; God's name hold in reverence, Nor take it in vain; Be thoughtful and earnest, Kindhearted and true; Look ever to Jesus, He'll carry you through. 3. To him that overcometh God giveth a crown; through faith we will conquer, though often cast down; he who is our saviour our strength will renew; look ever to Jesus, he'll carry you through.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 150 Views
  • I will protect you, not just from the world, but from the shadows that rise within your own heart. With all that I am, I will stand between you and every storm.
    I pledge my life to you, not out of duty, but from a love that runs deeper than words. My strength, my soul, my every breath — they belong to you.
    I bend my knee to you, not in surrender, but in reverence. You are my queen, not by crown or command, but by the way your spirit reigns over mine.
    In your smile, I find my purpose. In your sorrow, I find my fight. And if the world ever forgets who you are, I will remind it with the fire I carry for you.
    You are not just loved. You are sacred to me.
    I will protect you, not just from the world, but from the shadows that rise within your own heart. With all that I am, I will stand between you and every storm. I pledge my life to you, not out of duty, but from a love that runs deeper than words. My strength, my soul, my every breath — they belong to you. I bend my knee to you, not in surrender, but in reverence. You are my queen, not by crown or command, but by the way your spirit reigns over mine. In your smile, I find my purpose. In your sorrow, I find my fight. And if the world ever forgets who you are, I will remind it with the fire I carry for you. You are not just loved. You are sacred to me.
    0 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 158 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    Love
    1
    3 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 238 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    Love
    1
    2 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 240 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    1 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 246 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    1 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 249 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    6 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 232 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    6 Yorumlar 0 hisse senetleri 230 Views
  • SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY!

    Beloved brethren,

    This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion.

    The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points:
    1. The song’s popularity and viral trend.
    2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor.
    3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.”

    While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain.

    There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence.

    If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention.

    The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard.

    The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture.

    Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine.

    Your brother in Christ,
    Prophet Joel Ogebe
    SO THAT WE WILL BE MANY! Beloved brethren, This message is not to stir enmity, but to bring balance to an unbalanced position shared by a fellow believer. When matters cross denominational lines, they must be weighed by Scripture and sound doctrine—not personal bias or emotion. The brother in question did not speak by prophecy, and even if he had, Scripture commands us to judge all things (1 Corinthians 14:29). Neither did he rightly handle doctrine to show how the song’s lyrics contradict the gospel or biblical truth. Instead, his critique rested on three non-doctrinal points: 1. The song’s popularity and viral trend. 2. His personal view of Gaise Baba’s hairstyle and public demeanor. 3. Pastor Lawrence Oyor wearing a headband labeled “Jesus,” along with the presence of dance in the video, which he dismisses as mere “vibes.” While these observations may reflect personal preferences, they do not amount to doctrinal error nor invalidate our faith in Christ. Corrections, if necessary, should be done in love, not with public disdain. There is no such thing as a “gospel beat”—only a gospel message. As a psalmist, I know that while certain beats may not stir spiritual expression or suit all messages, that doesn’t mean upbeat songs lack spiritual value. The video in question was shot in church, the dancers were believers (including children and elders), and the lyrics were Christ-centered and edifying. The dance was not sensual or suggestive, and the ministers carried themselves with reverence. If unbelievers relate to the sound, that’s not a license to reduce it to “vibes.” Rather, it’s an opportunity to teach the truth embedded in the sound now that we have their attention. The statements made by the brother were not grounded in Scripture and lacked wise counsel. If he truly seeks to address worldliness, he must apply the same scrutiny to elements like microphones, lighting, or stage design—also “of the world” in origin. But clearly, that would be an unbiblical standard. The spirit of his correction was more deceptive than discerning. And those who support it seem to be responding from personal taste, not Scripture. Finally, let us not respond with insults. If we attack him for criticizing a minister we admire, are we not guilty of the same error? This is not a war over who is right, but a call to edify the Church in truth and love. Disagreements are welcome—if they are backed by sound doctrine. Your brother in Christ, Prophet Joel Ogebe
    1 Yorumlar 1 hisse senetleri 324 Views
Arama Sonuçları